4. Classification of Covering
Definition 4.1. The universal cover of is a covering map with simply connected.
The universal cover is unique (if exists) up to homeomorphism. This follows from the lifting criterion and the unique lifting property of covering maps. We left it as an exercise to readers.
Definition 4.2. A space is semi-locally simply connected if for any , there is a neighbourhood such that the image of the map is trivial.
We recall the following theorem from point-set topology.
Theorem 4.3 (Existence of the universal cover). Assume is path connected and locally path connected. Then universal cover of exists if and only if is semi-locally simply connected.
Definition 4.4. We define the category of coverings of where
• | an object is a covering map ; |
• | a morphism between two coverings and is a map such that the following diagram is commutative |
Definition 4.5. Let be connected. We define to be the subcategory whose objects consist of coverings of which are connected spaces.
Proposition 4.6. Let be connected and locally path connected. Then any morphism in is a covering map.
Definition 4.7. We define the category , where
• | an object is a set with -action and |
• | morphisms are -equivariant set maps, i.e. such that , for any . |
Given a covering , , the transport functor shows
Lemma 4.8. Let be path connected. Then acts transitively on if and only if is path connected.
Proof. The "if" part follows from Proposition 3.23. We prove the "only if" part.
Let us fix a point . Assume acts transitively on . This implies that any point in is connected to by a path. Given any point , let be a path in that connects to . The transport functor gives a path connecting to some point in . This further implies that is path connected to . This proves the "only if" part.
Corollary 4.9. Let be path connected, be a covering. Then there is a one-to-one correspondence between path connected components of and -orbits in .
Example 4.10. Let be the universal covering. By Proposition 3.23, the fiber can be identified with itself.
Proposition 4.11. Assume is path connected and locally path connected. Let . Thenfor any .
Proof. Let , i.e.By restricting to the fiber , it induces a mapBy the same argument as in Proposition 3.30, we find is -equivariant. Thus we obtain a map
The injectivity of follows from the uniqueness of the lifting.
Theorem 4.12. Assume is path connected, locally path connected and semi-locally simply connected. . Then there exists an equivalence of categories
Proof. Let us denote . Let be a fixed universal cover of and chosen.
Definition 4.13. Let be path connected and be a connected covering. A deck transformation (or covering transformation) of is a homeomorphism such that .Let denote the group of deck transformations.
Note that acts freely on by the Uniqueness of Lifting.
Proposition 4.14. Let be path connected and be a connected covering. Then acts properly discontinuously on .
Corollary 4.15. Assume is path connected, locally path connected. Let be a connected covering, , . Thenwhereis the normalizer of in .
Definition 4.16. We define the orbit category :
• | objects consist of (left) coset , where is a subgroup of ; |
• | morphisms are -equivariant maps: . |
If we restrict Theorem 4.12 to connected coverings, we find
Theorem 4.17. Assume is path connected, locally path connected and semi-locally simply connected. . Then there exists an equivalence of categories
The universal cover corresponds to the orbit . For the orbit , it corresponds toThis can be illustrated by the following correspondence
A more intrinsic formulation is as follows. Given a covering , we obtain a transport functorGiven a commutative diagramwe find a natural transformation
The above structure can be summarized by a functor
Theorem 4.18. Assume is path connected, locally path connected and semi-locally simply connected. Then is an equivalence of categories.