4. Classification of Covering

Definition 4.1. The universal cover of is a covering map with simply connected.

The universal cover is unique (if exists) up to homeomorphism. This follows from the lifting criterion and the unique lifting property of covering maps. We left it as an exercise to readers.

Definition 4.2. A space is semi-locally simply connected if for any , there is a neighbourhood such that the image of the map is trivial.

We recall the following theorem from point-set topology.

Theorem 4.3 (Existence of the universal cover). Assume is path connected and locally path connected. Then universal cover of exists if and only if is semi-locally simply connected.

Definition 4.4. We define the category of coverings of where

an object is a covering map ;

a morphism between two coverings and is a map such that the following diagram is commutative

Definition 4.5. Let be connected. We define to be the subcategory whose objects consist of coverings of which are connected spaces.

Proposition 4.6. Let be connected and locally path connected. Then any morphism in is a covering map.

Proof. Exercise.

Definition 4.7. We define the category , where

an object is a set with -action and

morphisms are -equivariant set maps, i.e. such that , for any .

Given a covering , , the transport functor shows

Lemma 4.8. Let be path connected. Then acts transitively on if and only if is path connected.

Proof. The "if" part follows from Proposition 3.23. We prove the "only if" part.

Let us fix a point . Assume acts transitively on . This implies that any point in is connected to by a path. Given any point , let be a path in that connects to . The transport functor gives a path connecting to some point in . This further implies that is path connected to . This proves the "only if" part.

[h]
Figure 1. Transitivity v.s. path connectedness

Corollary 4.9. Let be path connected, be a covering. Then there is a one-to-one correspondence between path connected components of and -orbits in .

Proof. Exercise.

Example 4.10. Let be the universal covering. By Proposition 3.23, the fiber can be identified with itself.

Proposition 4.11. Assume is path connected and locally path connected. Let . Thenfor any .

Proof. Let , i.e.By restricting to the fiber , it induces a mapBy the same argument as in Proposition 3.30, we find is -equivariant. Thus we obtain a map

The injectivity of follows from the uniqueness of the lifting.

To prove surjectivity, we can assume is path connected, thus acts transitively on (Corollary 4.9). Given , let us fix two points . The -equivariance of gives rise to the homomorphismBy Lifting Criterion (Theorem 3.24), we obtain a morphism as required.

Theorem 4.12. Assume is path connected, locally path connected and semi-locally simply connected. . Then there exists an equivalence of categories

Proof. Let us denote . Let be a fixed universal cover of and chosen.

We will define the following functorsLet be a covering, we defineLet , we definewhere for any . Note that here represents the (right) -action on . Then we have natural isomorphismsHere is the natural isomorphism is the natural isomorphismwhich is determined by the identity map in .

Definition 4.13. Let be path connected and be a connected covering. A deck transformation (or covering transformation) of is a homeomorphism such that .Let denote the group of deck transformations.

Note that acts freely on by the Uniqueness of Lifting.

Proposition 4.14. Let be path connected and be a connected covering. Then acts properly discontinuously on .

Proof. Exercise.

Corollary 4.15. Assume is path connected, locally path connected. Let be a connected covering, , . Thenwhereis the normalizer of in .

Proof. By Proposition 3.23, Lemma 4.8 and Theorem 4.12

Definition 4.16. We define the orbit category :

objects consist of (left) coset , where is a subgroup of ;

morphisms are -equivariant maps: .

Note and are isomorphic in if and only if and are conjugate subgroups of .

If we restrict Theorem 4.12 to connected coverings, we find

Theorem 4.17. Assume is path connected, locally path connected and semi-locally simply connected. . Then there exists an equivalence of categories

The universal cover corresponds to the orbit . For the orbit , it corresponds toThis can be illustrated by the following correspondence

A more intrinsic formulation is as follows. Given a covering , we obtain a transport functorGiven a commutative diagramwe find a natural transformation

The above structure can be summarized by a functor

Theorem 4.18. Assume is path connected, locally path connected and semi-locally simply connected. Then is an equivalence of categories.